Conner Posted October 24, 2010 Share Posted October 24, 2010 Nice pics though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hana Posted October 27, 2010 Author Share Posted October 27, 2010 lololJust scrolling through vanilla textures in bsa commander, and discovered a texture under arena called bigassrope.dds. :lol:There's no bigassrope.nif to go with it though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conner Posted October 27, 2010 Share Posted October 27, 2010 Under the arena, eh? Why would they need a big ass rope texture under the arena? Or do you mean under the category of arena? (Still, why would they have needed a big ass rope texture in the arena setting either?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwip Posted October 28, 2010 Share Posted October 28, 2010 Goes with the gates, IIRC. Found that doing my AFK_Arena retex, and loled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conner Posted October 28, 2010 Share Posted October 28, 2010 Part of the gate uses a skin from a big rope, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwip Posted October 28, 2010 Share Posted October 28, 2010 You don't see them much, IIRC, but there are, well, big ass ropes attached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conner Posted October 28, 2010 Share Posted October 28, 2010 It's been quite awhile since my last visit to the arena, guess I'd forgotten the gate there is held by big ol' ropes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hana Posted October 28, 2010 Author Share Posted October 28, 2010 No, big ass ropes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conner Posted October 28, 2010 Share Posted October 28, 2010 Well, yeah, but I was just trying not to keep repeating the same term before it got too monotonous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwip Posted October 28, 2010 Share Posted October 28, 2010 But big ass sounds amusinger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conner Posted October 28, 2010 Share Posted October 28, 2010 That may well be so, but even the best term gets old when it's overused, especially in a short span. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthmoor Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 This new permissions thing on Nexus is stirring up quite the controversy. Whatever happened to a sound understanding of copyright? IE: You have no rights if the author hasn't said you do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hana Posted November 1, 2010 Author Share Posted November 1, 2010 I was wondering the same thing.And I think ninja took it way over the top by writing his own license. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conner Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 New permissions thing? :huh:Maybe I should remain happy that I don't hang out there often... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthmoor Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 What? Ninja wrote his own license?And yeah, I couldn't just ignore 5 pages of back and forth that eventually landed on "Use it with our blessing unless the author comes back and says otherwise".Yet, they're also going back and forth with all the various checkboxes and shit and implying that stolen mods will be smashed by the banhammer at the slightest hint of theft.Something doesn't add up here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hana Posted November 1, 2010 Author Share Posted November 1, 2010 Oh, I guess you missed it buried in one of his threads - see page 3.I don't visit the Nexus forums so I've not seen this discussion, but what possessed them to even add this in the first place? If people are going to steal mods they really don't care what words are written on it or what checkboxes were checked.All I know is I'm getting tired of the spam on the updates page when authors add this to their pages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthmoor Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 I've seen that license on other mods before. I don't remember which ones, but I think that's semi-generic.Nexus is pushing their luck if they think this "it's ok until the author comes back and says no" policy is going to fly. It's patently disrespectful of both common decency AND the law.Yeah, I bet the update lists are largely useless right now as everyone scrambles to protect themselves from a non-issue that only became one when Nexus decided they wanted to be more like Pirate Bay than a normal mod host. Yes, I feel that strongly about how this is being handled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwip Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 So, it may just be me, but I'm not sure what you're arguing is entirely consistent with what actually seems to be in place. The set of default permissions on AFK_Weye, which I haven't yet done anything with, seems fairly reasonable to me.The issue of busywork to catch for idiot noobs aside, what's there doesn't strike me as particularly horrid.Of course, I've been alternating blinding headaches and fighting the zombie apocalypse all weekend, so what do I know? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conner Posted November 1, 2010 Share Posted November 1, 2010 Glad to hear that you got to enjoy Halloween, Dwip... hope the headaches have resolved themselves by now though.The screen shot Dwip's provided makes it look more straightforward than having to read the actual license for each mod, otherwise.. what's the issue? (aside from the silly notion that whatever can fly just fine until the given mod's author specifically speaks up to say otherwise.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthmoor Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 That's not where the issue is Dwip, you should read the thread that announced the feature. I realize it's got 15+ pages of huge tl;dr posts in it, but it really does sound like they're trying to trump copyright law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hana Posted November 2, 2010 Author Share Posted November 2, 2010 Ownership/copyright issues. Where have I heard that one before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arthmoor Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Yeah. Who'dathunkit. Also, it seems the concerns of myself and others has been blissfully ignored by DarkOne. He's focusing his wrath on yelling at poor Holbrook even though the guy is 100% right that this policy is a total contradiction of how the site has operated for the last 9 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conner Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 So, are you saying that basically they've changed site policy regarding copyrights of mod authors to something what's_his_name at The Guild (or whatever his UK site was called again) would've preferred? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hana Posted November 2, 2010 Author Share Posted November 2, 2010 Well, I was meaning along the lines of MudBytes and their "Hey, I changed one line of this Smaug code, it's now MINE and I erased everyone's credits" thingy that was going on there at one point. Probably still is.And hey Conner, you're a PUDDLE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwip Posted November 2, 2010 Share Posted November 2, 2010 Condense it for the rabbit? I read about a page of that thread, and I'm really not getting it, here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now