Jump to content

Starfield


Arthmoor

Recommended Posts

How on Earth did that come out before the SFSE update itself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Arthmoor said:

How on Earth did that come out before the SFSE update itself?

Same thing happened last time - Address Library was updated first, then SFSE.

Me, I'm taking Sergeant Schultz's line - "I know nothing" :teehee:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the CK on auto-update, but the game on update only when run. The updated CK repeatedly crashed on startup, until I'd updated and run the game once. There's an unknown link between them. Perhaps the shaders? The game spent rather a long time updating them.

Also, the CK seems slower than ever. What "archives" is it initializing? Why is it even bothering with facegen?

The slowness makes me always hesitant to run the CK, and then leave it idling for days at a time. It claims 237 hours, but I've probably only used it 20-30 real working hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CK and game have always had linkage between them, regardless of which game you're playing. I don't think anyone knows exactly what the linkage is, but you always need to keep them in sync for things to work right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOOT has updated to version 0.24.0

https://www.nexusmods.com/site/mods/439
https://github.com/loot/loot/releases

This release updates LOOT's Starfield support to account for Shattered Space and the changes introduced in Starfield's latest patch, plus improves support for Starfield's blueprint plugin type.

Changelog here: https://loot.readthedocs.io/en/latest/app/changelog.html
 

Edited by smr1957
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I ran LOOT and it seems they've managed to bork things. The initial load order is wrong and warning notices appear for all full masters stating:
"This plugin is not a blueprint master and requires the blueprint master "BlueprintShips-Starfield.esm". This can cause issues in-game, as this plugin will always load before "BlueprintSjips-Starfield.esm".

Of course, the proper load order for the Starfield master files may be, as Arthmoor has pointed out, hard coded, so this may not mean anything in practical terms, but it would still be nice if things were got right.

Initial Load Order should be:

Starfield.esm
ShatteredSpace.esm [if you have this DLC]
Constellation.esm [If you have this DLC]
OldMars.esm [If you have this DLC]
BlueprintShips-Starfield.esm
SFBGS007.esm
SFBGS008.esm
SFBGS006.esm
SFBGS003.esm
SFBGS004.esm
[Other Official Files TBD]
unofficial starfield patch.esm OR StarfieldCommunityPatch.esm
unofficial shattered space patch.esm (if you have Shattered Space DLC)
[Everything else you have installed]

LOOT is setting it as:

Starfield.esm
ShatteredSpace.esm
Constellation.esm
OldMars.esm
SFBGS003.esm
SFBGS004.esm
SFBGS006.esm
SFBGS007.esm
SFBGS008.esm
unofficial starfield patch.esm
unofficial shattered space patch.esm
(all other plugins)
BlueprintShips-Starfield.esm

 

For now, until these issues have been corrected, it would probably be best not to update to this latest version of LOOT.

See below discussion posts for complete updated information and corrections.

 

Edited by smr1957
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ortham has said that they changed the order of the hardcoding with 1.14.70 so LOOT is probably right.

That being said, the CK doesn't agree. It orders things 4,7,8,3,6 right now. Instead of 7,8,6,3,4 which it did at the time USFP set the order on those.

Ultimately since nobody has any control over what the order is, it doesn't really matter what each tool says it is. It's what the game actually loads that matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Arthmoor said:

Ortham has said that they changed the order of the hardcoding with 1.14.70 so LOOT is probably right.

That being said, the CK doesn't agree. It orders things 4,7,8,3,6 right now. Instead of 7,8,6,3,4 which it did at the time USFP set the order on those.

Ultimately since nobody has any control over what the order is, it doesn't really matter what each tool says it is. It's what the game actually loads that matters.

Thanks for that info - and yes, since the game is handling the loading, and that's hardcoded, it probably does not make much difference.  I'll be quoting this in my other threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The order of the official files has been determined through testing by both Silarn and Ortham, see here and here, and therefore LOOT displays them as such.

image.png.ac9e1fdb6bf8549be9e2b6f1c3e992bc.png

 

When it comes to our new warning message, it is like the changelog of v0.24.0 says:

Quote

A warning message is now displayed for any non-blueprint-master plugin that has a blueprint master plugin as one of its masters.

This message will only be shown, if the above criteria has been met, it doesn't show for all masters (full or otherwise).

 

Therefore, as of right now, I don't see anything that needs to be changed in LOOT v0.24.0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think anyone was suggesting something needs to change, but the problem with setting load orders to show like this is that plugins being made in the CK won't follow the same order because for some reason Bethesda doesn't have the CK following the game logic.

As far as the files you list from 10 to 21, those are being set in plugins.txt and the game acknowledges this if you shuffle the ordering for them using a mod manager etc. Plus if you look directly at the plugins.txt file you will see them listed as normal with a * in front. The two GitHub posts do appear to have the right of it, since files 10 through 21 are not listed in either post.

IMO the biggest pain in the ass with all of this is how they've decided to handle the blueprints file. If they're forcing it to load last, it by definition should break anything that's trying to fix a bug that's covered by that file. Such as the two Kepler ships that shouldn't be counting against the player's fleet inventory because they are quest rewards, like Razorleaf and the Star Eagle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Arthmoor said:

I don't think anyone was suggesting something needs to change

smr1957 actively warns people to not use LOOT v0.24.0 right now in this topic, as well as in Starfield's discussion area on Steam. Therefore I clarified that, right now, I do not see an issue in v0.24.0 that needs to be fixed.

 

10 minutes ago, Arthmoor said:

but the problem with setting load orders to show like this is that plugins being made in the CK won't follow the same order because for some reason Bethesda doesn't have the CK following the game logic.

Perhaps we should ask Cartogriffi to verify our findings, and/or if there are plans to update the CK to follow the game logic.

 

10 minutes ago, Arthmoor said:

As far as the files you list from 10 to 21, those are being set in plugins.txt and the game acknowledges this if you shuffle the ordering for them using a mod manager etc. Plus if you look directly at the plugins.txt file you will see them listed as normal with a * in front. The two GitHub posts do appear to have the right of it, since files 10 through 21 are not listed in either post.

Yeah, we are fully aware about those, they are all official Creations by BGS (hence they write them with lowercase letters). The only files discussed in the linked GitHub issue, and which I was talking about in my post above, are the base game files that are written with uppercase letters.

 

10 minutes ago, Arthmoor said:

IMO the biggest pain in the ass with all of this is how they've decided to handle the blueprints file. If they're forcing it to load last, it by definition should break anything that's trying to fix a bug that's covered by that file. Such as the two Kepler ships that shouldn't be counting against the player's fleet inventory because they are quest rewards, like Razorleaf and the Star Eagle.

It is a rather unconventional choice they made.

Also just to mention it, here is an article from Ortham regarding blueprint plugins. Note, that it was written before Starfield v1.14.70.0 was released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...